have held H. Mi Consul open
10
grave censure,
had be
upon
the faith
of such an
entirely unsupported tale,
taken upon himself to call in
a
question
in any was disperse the clear right
of confiscation which the Chinese Gove
possessed and,
my opinion
unduly received. What Kwok- a Cheong,
partizans, may
in
any of his friends of
little couscquence,
think is of veryp
to rus
ex
audi
matter of absoluter indifference,
but I hold it
importance
Cry
}
424
same respect for the rights of the Chmere that
any Sudge
we exact for
our
fiers
In this
Case
would have
been entitled to
require
detailed
ard
va.
tisfaisons proof of the actual cuplay of
this chife for
serve
trine
precious
No The
- voyage during which she was seized _ in
the same?
way
trought before
-
I should heat a Araw
me charged
rged with
being in
à house, where he had no
in the middle of the night,
right sobe,
so should I
laves treated this ship, jound four miles
fo
le of the highest
entrusted)
exp
that all whic
I. Mis Gout with the
Con duet
our relations with the Good of China.
Govt
should not in strict accordance with
a river not leading to a Tuaty port - The presumption is that the
the Ship were, the
man
and
one in the house,
the other in the river, for an unlawfull
1
Treaty stipulations
and show.
the
purpose - the omes
of disproving this
presumption
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.